Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 14:48

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why is Harley-Davidson dropping diversity initiatives after the right-wing anti-DEI campaign?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Race and genetics do not line up well, new study confirms - Live Science
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Which movies have the best endings?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How much of lounge pianists playing is from repertoire, and how much is improvised?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.